= clown

I don't mind him penalising us but all he did is warn them on the run for the same offences..





Sh!tbag!!!

i think harsh really, the game would have been hard to ref and i think he did ok. was he really that bad for us?

According to a Sky Sports camera man he saved you 4 points by not going to the video ref in the first half.

he was terrible never lets the game flow, no matter who he is refereing

but then didn't save us by going to the video ref for the Harris "try"

He couldn't see, he didn't get the decision wrong if it wasn't a try, I couldn't see, Hicks made the decision.

Inconsistant reffing and Harris never got near the line with that "Try"! Thought both sides were frustrated by his reffing and Fev got rattled at the end. Score flattered us to be fair.

was i watching a different game? there were loads of legitimate penalties, it was that type of game, which was the only negative from the spectacle.

the ref did nothing to hinder out chances of coming away with 3 points tonight.

video ref decisions are a totally isolated matter

Never said they was not legitimate or against us.. Just more inconsitant when penalising both sides. If we had lost I would not be blaming the ref.

ok i repect that

just feel i have seen much worse ref performances (by an absolute mile) that have gone by relatively unmentioned

Childs was weak for both sides. Made some very poor calls, most annoying for me when they pushed and pushed and pushed Barker (?) back about 20 metres and he decided to shout "held" the spilt second he offloaded to Big Frank. Childs should have seen was NOT a penalty (it was a clear cut case of "simultaneous action" and should have immediately waved play on) but called it so. It got to the stage where I was waiting for the next dodgy call which damages the entertainment somewhat. A bit of a "pinky and perky" double act he had with court jester hicks.