I didn't actually hear the comments about Worral, but there is a big difference between keeping game breakers on, and not experienced enough to play. Either was it seems like a bad game plan. We should try to spell our players so that we can have the game breakers on the field at the end if needed, maybe having more faith in someone like Worral to do a job earlier in the game would mean that the gamebreakers were in a better way late on.

Yes, Eddie asked him why Worral wasn't used and that was his reply. It was alarming imo. A real worry going into the playoffs. Suppose it depends on the Kirke and Bailey situations.

I'm guessing if it did those two positions would be reversed.

That's garbage frankly.



Gibson must have 20+ games under his belt by now. How many games did Ratu have under his belt?



Why hadn't he played Worrall earlier leaving his "game-breakers" that bit fresher towards then end of the game?



If he has no faith in Worrall why not select Watkins or Gibson on the bench allowing him to put Senior into the 2nd row as he's done many times this season?



It was plain dumb to select a player in the 17 and then fail to get him on the field in a game like that, however he wants to dress it up.

Yes agreed fella. I found it bizarre his reasoning..

Many times?



Perhaps the Senior move into the pack has been declared ineffective for now?



[url=http://viewtopic.php?t=420684&highlight=V Hull KR his metres gained were by some distance a season low (38 ), while his defensive workload was by some distance a season high (37).[/url



Is it a coincidence that in the next game he's off the boil?



In addition his winger Hall was quieter than usual (V Hull KR), another coincidence or evidence that Leeds should leave their left side alone?

JJB and McGuire should be fined for Friday night.



School boy penalties on more then 1 occasion, needs to be addressed and it needs sorting quickly!!!



I've seen better discipline at an under-10's game then Friday from Leeds!

After Senior had made a couple of errors we didn't seem to use him as much as in previous games. (

I can't get over the 2 penalties we conceded at the play the ball, tackled player gets done for striking out....! not seen in it in any game all season. I mean Cunningham punched a player against wakey and that never got picked up.

A bit like the Brent Webb no try at Bradford, not seen that call again..

the VR looked at it and decided there was nothing in it. the RFL looked at it and gave him a caution. like you i think he was a very lucky boy on both counts

The Cunnigham thing just looked bad to me...

The penalties we gave away on friday didn't look bad....

They were bad...

The smithy one was ridiculous imo especially as tompkins was still grabbing his collar as he's trying to play the ball.