|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57859/578592ddc157808710926a591f302612c8bc114d" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3491 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2014 | Dec 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I personally have tried to avoid getting on the back of players like Riddell and Roberts (mainly after how much of a turn around a player can make after a season, Richards for example) so I have been in favour of giving them a "settling in" period.
But after tonight I think its only fair on Ainscough that soon as he is fit to play (apparently injured but correct me if Im wrong) he should get Roberts' place in the 1st team.
He had a stinker of a start and was a shoddy second to Fox but then when he made that break I thought we would get a glimse of what everyone was claiming to be his true strength, His pace in open field...
Instead what do we see? He gets chased down quickly on 2 occassions when he is through and clear.
I think he should get another chance next season but I am truely in favour of using Ainscough for the remainder of the season (especially after seeing the passion shown from the likes of Tomkins, McIlorum, OLoughlin tonight) and give a determined young player a chance who will give 150% whenever he has the ball.
Were giving away tried in Roberts anyway so why not give Ainscough his chance and hopefully get more tried for us instead of against.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 9022 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2010 | Nov 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| He isnt all bad he does some good things (made a few breaks today and did fantastic in the build up to pats 2nd try) if we didnt have Ainscough waiting for his place in the team behind him i dont think he would get as much criticism as he does but for me he just doesnt look d, and frankly i cant believe we gave him a 4 year contract data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6da5/f6da5ead84fead471ea5d14392b954bdff4ef2b9" alt="Rolling Eyes icon_rolleyes.gif"
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4169 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote W!64N_ENTHUSI45T="W!64N_ENTHUSI45T"I personally have tried to avoid getting on the back of players like Riddell and Roberts (mainly after how much of a turn around a player can make after a season, Richards for example) so I have been in favour of giving them a "settling in" period.
But after tonight I think its only fair on Ainscough that soon as he is fit to play (apparently injured but correct me if Im wrong) he should get Roberts' place in the 1st team.
He had a stinker of a start and was a shoddy second to Fox but then when he made that break I thought we would get a glimse of what everyone was claiming to be his true strength, His pace in open field...
Instead what do we see? He gets chased down quickly on 2 occassions when he is through and clear.
I think he should get another chance next season but I am truely in favour of using Ainscough for the remainder of the season (especially after seeing the passion shown from the likes of Tomkins, McIlorum, OLoughlin tonight) and give a determined young player a chance who will give 150% whenever he has the ball.
Were giving away tried in Roberts anyway so why not give Ainscough his chance and hopefully get more tried for us instead of against.'"
To be fair to Roberts, Peter Fox is lightening.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 3781 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2014 | Sep 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Ancient & Loyal="Ancient & Loyal"To be fair to Roberts, Peter Fox is lightening.'"
Correct....Fox is rapid.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3614 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2018 | Nov 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote W!64N_ENTHUSI45T="W!64N_ENTHUSI45T":17ojfvmuI personally have tried to avoid getting on the back of players like Riddell and Roberts (mainly after how much of a turn around a player can make after a season, Richards for example) so I have been in favour of giving them a "settling in" period.
But after tonight I think its only fair on Ainscough that soon as he is fit to play (apparently injured but correct me if Im wrong) he should get Roberts' place in the 1st team.
He had a stinker of a start and was a shoddy second to Fox but then when he made that break I thought we would get a glimse of what everyone was claiming to be his true strength, His pace in open field...
Instead what do we see? He gets chased down quickly on 2 occassions when he is through and clear.
I think he should get another chance next season but I am truely in favour of using Ainscough for the remainder of the season (especially after seeing the passion shown from the likes of Tomkins, McIlorum, OLoughlin tonight) and give a determined young player a chance who will give 150% whenever he has the ball.
Were giving away tried in Roberts anyway so why not give Ainscough his chance and hopefully get more tried for us instead of against.'" we scored not soon after.
Definately righted the wrongs of his early mistakes throughout the match and after the first 10/15 mins was one of our better players.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3491 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2014 | Dec 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Ancient & Loyal="Ancient & Loyal"To be fair to Roberts, Peter Fox is lightening.'"
Very true and I know that.
But when I saw that it just ruin the little hope I had that he would really show some burning pace.
Thats what his main attribute has been made out to be and when I saw him make that break I got excited that he was going to go flying away the way Carney and Dallas used to and show us a great flying wingers try. But when he got caught so soon I was really dissapointed.
I didnt call for him to be shipped off or anythin OTT like that but for the time being Ainscough should get his chance.
Form over Reputation should be the true selector...
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 14395 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | May 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote W!64N_ENTHUSI45T="W!64N_ENTHUSI45T"I personally have tried to avoid getting on the back of players like Riddell and Roberts (mainly after how much of a turn around a player can make after a season, Richards for example) so I have been in favour of giving them a "settling in" period.
But after tonight I think its only fair on Ainscough that soon as he is fit to play (apparently injured but correct me if Im wrong) he should get Roberts' place in the 1st team.
He had a stinker of a start and was a shoddy second to Fox but then when he made that break I thought we would get a glimse of what everyone was claiming to be his true strength, His pace in open field...
Instead what do we see? He gets chased down quickly on 2 occassions when he is through and clear.
I think he should get another chance next season but I am truely in favour of using Ainscough for the remainder of the season (especially after seeing the passion shown from the likes of Tomkins, McIlorum, OLoughlin tonight) and give a determined young player a chance who will give 150% whenever he has the ball.
Were giving away tried in Roberts anyway so why not give Ainscough his chance and hopefully get more tried for us instead of against.'"
I agree. He got caught when he made breaks v Salford as well so it isn't just him losing the race against Fox he just doesn't look that fast, period.
The duty of care nonsense re Ainscough is now surely not applicable given the number of games left.
Ainscough's attacking statistics walk all over Roberts and I don't just mean tries scored.
Dave
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12903 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2021 | Aug 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Fox is imo the quickest player in the league, getting caught by him was no disgrace.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4169 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2025 | Jan 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote W!64N_ENTHUSI45T="W!64N_ENTHUSI45T"Very true and I know that.
But when I saw that it just ruin the little hope I had that he would really show some burning pace.
Thats what his main attribute has been made out to be and when I saw him make that break I got excited that he was going to go flying away the way Carney and Dallas used to and show us a great flying wingers try. But when he got caught so soon I was really dissapointed.
I didnt call for him to be shipped off or anythin OTT like that but for the time being Ainscough should get his chance.
Form over Reputation should be the true selector...'"
Ainscough is still our top try scorer and is a great finisher but teams may unfortunately pinpoint him with kicks as we found out Vs Warrington earlier in the season.
I can understand why Noble is playing it safe and keeping Ainscough in the reserves especially considering Noble's job is on the line and the fact that currently we have less than a 50:50 win/loss ratio.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 897 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2011 | Nov 2010 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Has anybody noticed Roberts likeness to a Klingon when up close?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 20522 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Do not think he can take blame for the second Fox try, he moved infield to cover for Smith who was injured and trying to stay out of the way on the wing.
It is interesting to see the reaction off the dropped ball for the first try, which in truth was a difficult one coming out of the sun and with his blockers (Tim Smith) running in the total wrong area of the pitch. Taking all that into account Ainscough would still have been crucified.
The lad though i felt did some pretty good things as well tonight, he certainly does not have the gas he has been hyped up to, again i do think this may be an issue with our coaching rather than the player himself as he certainly looks to have lost a yard from his NRL days. His ball for Bailey off the deck was superb as was the experience and thinking to put Richards in.
The question is raised though would Ainscough have had to come up with those plays or would he have scored them himself? Who knows? I think he may well have finished at least one and made more of the space he had, but apart from the high ball a bit hard to criticise him tonight, much in the same way it is pretty hard to criticise Ainscough or at least go way OTT when he makes an error on the kicks, which Roberts has also struggled under.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1350 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2011 | Nov 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| This is going too sound harsh but IMO, Wigan would be a better team by replacing.
Riddell (too slow, not creative enough and embarrassed by McIllorum when he came on),
Roberts,(positionally shocking can't catch is an Aussie version of Calderwood),
Smith, (doesnt look interested half the time best thing that happened today was him getting injured, bad I know),
and Feka (one good run all game, he seems to be offering less and less every week I know he is great with the fans but he needs too start offering more for the team).
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57859/578592ddc157808710926a591f302612c8bc114d" alt="" |
|