Pearson needs to have a chat with himself if he thinks people will pay £23 to watch utter dross.. fc=not value for money, same as its employees

Yet there's still people that do, go figure.

The dictionary definition of fickle.

Theres people who strap tnt to themselves and set it off in public places, thinking there going to a land of virgins etc... go figure

What's that got to do with anything?

Just saying, i cant understand that either

Hardly comparible, ones a game ffs.

Fair enough

IanP is completely right with his post.



Rugby League is entertainment at the end of the day, and HullFC haven't been entertaining for far too long now, and many including myself have reached breaking point. Pearson has stated that no amount of banners, chants or protests will make him sack Radford. So our only form of protest is voting with our feet and wallets, I'm not spending a single penny more at the club until a competent, respected coaching team is put in place.

You won't be missed.

I alone won't be, but another couple of thousand drifting away and this club can't continue at this level. The balls in Pearson's court to finally make one decent decision and turn things around.

A couple of thousand won't drift though, they're not fickle.

I've got a black cat, you've got a puma called midnight, black cat time

People are giving their "reasons" for not attending, expensive, no value for money, bad management, the list goes on, that doesnt make us less of a fan, this makes us sensible, hull fc, unfortunately, it seems, is on its , and until things start to improve, let's start at the top, and that's Radford and his puppet last, have been given their p45, and someone of experience is brought in to steer us in the right direction, and get us results, then I, and many many others, will still tune in to results, and hope, pray, that we did well, but we will choose to spend our money elsewhere, FC will always be my team, but I'm not coined enough to follow blindly...

Have a word with yourself, fickle?? Not fans?? Ffs its people like you that put up with e, and still say it's fine are half the problem...

150th year of the club and fans are turning their backs after 5 games. Fickle.

Wondered how long it would be before that old line was trotted out. Bore off.

I wouldent be so sure, last year was the worst average attendance we've had at the KC, continuing a downward trend seen since 2010. If you want to keep falling for the clubs marketing and hype and hand over yet more cash for mediocre rugby then be my guest.

Utter tripe.

Those of us who have been going a long time have seen all sorts. Some of us kept going throughout and others left when it was rough then came back when it got better again. The ones who stayed despite it being difficult were far from being 'half the problem'. In part it was their money that ensured that the rest had something to come back to.



I'm no better fan than someone who comes and goes as they feel like it. But I'm certainly not anything to do with 'the problem'. Take your own advice and have a word with yourself.

5 games in and its the same old stretch of failure. One good win, 3 of those FC special 'almost got a win but fell short' defeats, one embarrassing capitulation for a TV audience. But still a few 150year celebration events and a few old players trotting out before kickoff and you're happy

The average may have been falling since 2010 but you are wrong with that part.



The average last year was 11,072. That's higher than 2005 and 2006.

5 games though.

Yet another claim that someone is automatically as happy as Larry with the situation just because they've decided not to stop supporting the club and are not posting their disgust and outrage on an almost permanent basis. Utter garbage.

5 games becomes 6,7,8,9,10....bad games, then whoops before you know it we're playing Sheffield